↓ Skip to main content

C-reactive protein: quantitative marker of surgical trauma and post-surgical complications in dogs: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
C-reactive protein: quantitative marker of surgical trauma and post-surgical complications in dogs: a systematic review
Published in
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13028-015-0164-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle B. Christensen, Thomas Eriksen, Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a major acute phase protein showing increasing serum concentrations in dogs with systemic inflammation following e.g., surgery, trauma, infections, or neoplasia. CRP is a useful diagnostic marker of systemic inflammation in dogs and automated assays have been validated for reliable measurements for routine diagnostic purposes. In the present study available evidence for the use of CRP as a marker of surgery related systemic inflammation in dogs was reviewed and assessed. Two main themes were in focus: (1) canine CRP as a potential marker of postsurgical infectious complications and (2) canine CRP as a marker of the degree of surgical trauma. As outlined in the review several studies suggest that CRP is a useful marker for both purposes. However, the evidence level is limited and studies in the field are all affected by considerable risks of bias. Thus, further studies are needed in order to confirm the assumptions from previous studies and increase the level of evidence for CRP as a useful marker for detecting inflammation after surgery in dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 36 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#360
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,714
of 294,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.