You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for training in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0481-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R.J. Kim, O.P. Simonetti, M. Westwood, C.M. Kramer, A. Narang, M.G. Friedrich, A.J. Powell, J.C. Carr, J. Schulz-Menger, E. Nagel, W.S. Chan, J. Bremerich, K.G. Ordovas, R.C. Rollings, A.R. Patel, V.A. Ferrari |
| Abstract |
These "Guidelines for training in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance" were developed by the Certification Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and approved by the SCMR Board of Trustees. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 29% |
| Spain | 8 | 8% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 14% |
| Scientists | 11 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 57% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#712,310
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#15
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,385
of 326,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.