↓ Skip to main content

Using parametric regressors to disentangle properties of multi-feature processes

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using parametric regressors to disentangle properties of multi-feature processes
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-4-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Wood, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Denise Sturm, Klaus Willmes

Abstract

FMRI data observed under a given experimental condition may be decomposed into two parts: the average effect and the deviation of single replications from this average effect. The average effect is represented by the mean activation over a specific condition. The deviation from this average effect may be decomposed into two components as well: systematic variation due to known empirical factors and pure measurement error. In most fMRI designs deviations from mean activation may be treated as measurement error. Nevertheless, often deviation from the average also may contain systematic variation that can be distinguished from simple measurement error. In these cases, the average fMRI signal may provide only a coarse picture of real brain activation. The larger the variation within-condition, the coarser the average effect and the more relevant is the impact of deviations from it. Systematic deviation from the mean activation may be examined by defining a set of parametric regressors. Here, the applicability of parametric methods to refine the evaluation of fMRI studies is discussed with special emphasis on (i) examination of the impact of continuous predictors on the fMRI signal, (ii) control for variation within each experimental condition and (iii) isolation of specific contributions by different features of a single complex stimulus, especially in the case of a sampled stimulus. The usefulness and applicability of this method are discussed and an example with real data is presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Germany 2 3%
Australia 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 58 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 27%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 41%
Neuroscience 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#316
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,641
of 92,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.