↓ Skip to main content

Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data
Published in
Trials, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-10-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Douglas G Altman

Abstract

Many research-funding agencies now require open access to the results of research they have funded, and some also require that researchers make available the raw data generated from that research. Similarly, the journal Trials aims to address inadequate reporting in randomised controlled trials, and in order to fulfil this objective, the journal is working with the scientific and publishing communities to try to establish best practice for publishing raw data from clinical trials in peer-reviewed biomedical journals. Common issues encountered when considering raw data for publication include patient privacy - unless explicit consent for publication is obtained - and ownership, but agreed-upon policies for tackling these concerns do not appear to be addressed in the guidance or mandates currently established. Potential next steps for journal editors and publishers, ethics committees, research-funding agencies, and researchers are proposed, and alternatives to journal publication, such as restricted access repositories, are outlined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 11%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Spain 3 3%
France 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Malawi 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 66 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 13 14%
Librarian 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 23 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 6 7%