↓ Skip to main content

Molecular incidence and clearance of Plasmodium falciparum infection

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular incidence and clearance of Plasmodium falciparum infection
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0941-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald J. Krogstad, Ousmane A. Koita, Mouctar Diallo, John L. Gerone, Belco Poudiougou, Mahamadou Diakité, Yéya T. Touré

Abstract

Although the epidemiology of malaria has been based primarily on microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests, molecular methods are necessary to understand the complexity of natural infection in regions where transmission is intense and simultaneous infection with multiple parasite genotypes is common such as sub-Saharan Africa. To compare microscopic and molecular estimates of the incidence and clearance of Plasmodium falciparum infection, we followed 80 children monthly for 1 year in the village of Bancoumana in Mali. Similar seasonal patterns were observed with both methods (rainy season peak, dry season nadir), although molecular methods detected more infections than microscopy (571 vs 331 in 906 specimens), more new infections (311 vs 104 during 829 person-months) and spontaneous clearance events (317 vs 116) and found higher incidence (0.38 vs 0.13 new genotypes/person/month, p < 0.001) and spontaneous clearance rates (0.38 vs 0.14 genotypes cleared/person/month, p < 0.001). These differences were greatest for persistently-infected subjects in whom neither new infections nor the clearance of old infections could be detected by microscopy (0.71 new infections and 0.73 cleared infections per month using molecular methods vs 0.000 by microscopy, p < 0.001). Molecular methods provide information about genetic diversity, the intensity of transmission and spontaneous clearance in the absence of drug treatment that cannot be obtained by microscopy. They will be necessary to evaluate the efficacy of vaccines, drugs and other control strategies for diseases such as malaria in which simultaneous infection with more than one organism (genotype) is common.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,135,862
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,585
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,626
of 288,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#64
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.