↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative evaluation of the strategy to eliminate human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative evaluation of the strategy to eliminate human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1131-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kat S. Rock, Steve J. Torr, Crispin Lumbala, Matt J. Keeling

Abstract

The virulent vector-borne disease, Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), is one of several diseases targeted for elimination by the World Health Organization. This article utilises human case data from a high-endemicity region of the Democratic Republic of Congo in conjunction with a suite of novel mechanistic mathematical models to address the effectiveness of on-going active screening and treatment programmes and compute the likely time to elimination as a public health problem (i.e. <1 case per 10,000 per year). The model variants address uncertainties surrounding transmission of HAT infection including heterogeneous risk of exposure to tsetse bites, non-participation of certain groups during active screening campaigns and potential animal reservoirs of infection. Model fitting indicates that variation in human risk of tsetse bites and participation in active screening play a key role in transmission of this disease, whilst the existence of animal reservoirs remains unclear. Active screening campaigns in this region are calculated to have been effective, reducing the incidence of new human infections by 52-53 % over a 15-year period (1998-2012). However, projections of disease dynamics in this region indicate that the elimination goal may not be met until later this century (2059-2092) under the current intervention strategy. Improvements to active detection, such as screening those who have not previously participated and raising overall screening levels, as well as beginning widespread vector control in the area have the potential to ensure successful and timely elimination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Lecturer 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Mathematics 8 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,228
of 5,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,804
of 283,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#111
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.