↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide variation in the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and its relationship with pathogenic traits

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide variation in the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and its relationship with pathogenic traits
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2085-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan E. Palomares-Rius, Isheng J. Tsai, Nurul Karim, Mitsuteru Akiba, Tetsuro Kato, Haruhiko Maruyama, Yuko Takeuchi, Taisei Kikuchi

Abstract

Bursaphelenchus xylophilus is an emerging pathogenic nematode that is responsible for a devastating epidemic of pine wilt disease across Asia and Europe. In this study, we report the first genome-wide variation analysis of the nematode with an aim to obtain a full picture of its diversity. We sequenced six key B. xylophilus strains using Illumina HiSeq sequencer. All the strains were isolated in Japan and have been widely used in previous studies. Detection of genomic variations were done by mapping the reads to the reference genome. Over 3 Mb of genetic variations, accounting for 4.1 % of the total genome, were detected as single nucleotide polymorphisms or small indels, suggesting multiple introductions of this invaded species from its native area into the country. The high level of genetic diversity of the pine wood nematode was related to its pathogenicity and ecological trait differences. Moreover, we identified a gene set affected by genomic variation, and functional annotation of those genes indicated that some of them had potential roles in pathogenesis. This study provides an important resource for understanding the population structure, pathogenicity and evolutionary ecology of the nematode, and further analysis based on this study with geographically diverse B. xylophilus populations will greatly accelerate our understanding of the complex evolutionary/epidemic history of this emerging pathogen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,584,167
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,529
of 11,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,159
of 295,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#69
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.