↓ Skip to main content

KIT exon 10 variant (c.1621 A > C) single nucleotide polymorphism as predictor of GIST patient outcome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
KIT exon 10 variant (c.1621 A > C) single nucleotide polymorphism as predictor of GIST patient outcome
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1817-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Brahmi, Laurent Alberti, Armelle Dufresne, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Philippe Cassier, Pierre Meeus, Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere, Dominique Ranchère-Vince, Jean-Yves Blay

Abstract

Tumor genotype plays a crucial role in clinical management of GIST. Whether genetic polymorphism of KIT may influence GIST patient outcome is unclear. We investigated the biological and clinical significance of the presence of KIT exon 10 variant (c.1621 A > C), KIT (L541) , in a transfected cell line (3 T3 L541) and in two retrospectively collected series of 109 GIST patients in total. The control group consisted of 60 healthy donors collected at the French department of blood transfusion. In the 3 T3 L541 cell line, KIT(L541) protein exhibited a spontaneous phosphorylation status comparable to that of wild-type KIT but displayed a phosphorylation pattern of AKT and ERK1/2 that was found similar to that of the classical mutated forms of the KIT receptor. Of 109 patients enrolled in this retrospective translational research study, 24 (22 %) harboured KIT (L541) , similarly to the control group of healthy donors (n = 10 of 60, 17 %). A higher prevalence of the variant KIT (L541) was observed in patients with metastatic status at diagnosis (KIT (L541) correlated nine of 22 versus 15 of 87, p = 0.02). In addition, patients with KIT (L541) and localized GIST had a higher rate of relapse at 5 years and lower relapse free survival at 5 years in univariate, as well as in multivariate analysis. Response rate and duration of response to imatinib was similar in KIT (L541) and KIT (M541) patients. KIT (L541) genotype is associated with a higher risk of metastasis at diagnosis and a higher risk of relapse in GIST patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,155
of 8,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,278
of 285,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#61
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.