↓ Skip to main content

Partial mastectomy using manual blunt dissection (MBD) in early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partial mastectomy using manual blunt dissection (MBD) in early breast cancer
Published in
BMC Surgery, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12893-015-0102-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichiro Kashiwagi, Naoyoshi Onoda, Yuka Asano, Kento Kurata, Tamami Morisaki, Satoru Noda, Hidemi Kawajiri, Tsutomu Takashima, Kosei Hirakawa

Abstract

Breast-preserving surgery (Bp) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) are established as standard treatment for axillary lymph node-negative early breast cancer. A surgical technique using manual blunt dissection (MBD), in which use of electrocautery, an ultrasonically activated scalpel, and ligation is minimized, is described. This involves an approach from small incisions in the axilla or areola to avoid injury to skin flaps, and with adequate mobilization of the breast, so that regardless of the tumor site, surgical wounds are not noticeable. The usefulness and tolerability of this surgical technique were examined. This surgical technique was evaluated in 233 patients. Surgery could be performed rapidly, with a mean operative time of 67 ± 21 min and a low mean blood loss of only 35 ± 28 ml. There was little need for postoperative analgesia, and surgery was well tolerated without postoperative bleeding or wound infection. Our proposed technique for partial mastectomy using MBD provides good curative and cosmetic results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Other 4 31%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,294,248
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#879
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,529
of 283,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.