↓ Skip to main content

HiFive: a tool suite for easy and efficient HiC and 5C data analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HiFive: a tool suite for easy and efficient HiC and 5C data analysis
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0806-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael EG Sauria, Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins, Victor G. Corces, James Taylor

Abstract

The chromatin interaction assays 5C and HiC have advanced our understanding of genomic spatial organization, but analysis approaches for these data are limited by usability and flexibility. The HiFive tool suite provides efficient data handling and a variety of normalization approaches for easy, fast analysis and method comparison. Integration of MPI-based parallelization allows scalability and rapid processing time. In addition to single-command analysis of an entire experiment from mapped reads to interaction values, HiFive has been integrated into the open-source, web-based platform Galaxy to connect users with computational resources and a graphical interface. HiFive is open-source software available from http://taylorlab.org/software/hifive/ .

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 117 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 27%
Researcher 32 25%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 29%
Computer Science 12 9%
Engineering 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 13 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,613,520
of 15,275,955 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,512
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,956
of 286,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#169
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,275,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.