You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-2-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lydia Kapiriri, Trude Arnesen, Ole Frithjof Norheim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Kenya | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#192
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,204
of 146,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.