You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
C60 fullerene as promising therapeutic agent for correcting and preventing skeletal muscle fatigue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-016-0246-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yurij I. Prylutskyy, Inna V. Vereshchaka, Andriy V. Maznychenko, Nataliya V. Bulgakova, Olga O. Gonchar, Olena A. Kyzyma, Uwe Ritter, Peter Scharff, Tomasz Tomiak, Dmytro M. Nozdrenko, Iryna V. Mishchenko, Alexander I. Kostyukov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 28% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 33% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,440,102
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#364
of 1,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,464
of 433,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,879 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.