↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Physical activity of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy individuals: an actigraphy study

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Physical activity of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy individuals: an actigraphy study
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13030-015-0047-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshihide Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi, Shyuji Inada, Kenji Shirakura, Naoki Wada, Kimihiko Takeuchi, Masatoshi Matsushita

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13030-015-0046-0.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#233
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,669
of 284,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.