Title |
Genome-wide analysis of chemically induced mutations in mouse in phenotype-driven screens
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12864-015-2073-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Denis C. Bauer, Brendan J. McMorran, Simon J. Foote, Gaetan Burgio |
Abstract |
N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagen has become the method of choice for inducing random mutations for forward genetics applications. However, distinguishing induced mutations from sequencing errors or sporadic mutations is difficult, which has hampered surveys of potential biases in the methodology in the past. Addressing this issue, we created a large cohort of mice with biological replicates enabling the confident calling of induced mutations, which in turn allowed us to conduct a comprehensive analysis of potential biases in mutation properties and genomic location. In the exome sequencing data we observe the known preference of ENU to cause [Formula: see text] transitions in longer genes. Mutations were frequently clustered and inherited in blocks hampering attempts to pinpoint individual causative mutations by genome analysis only. Furthermore, ENU mutations were biased towards areas in the genome that are accessible in testis, potentially limiting the scope of forward genetic approaches to only 1-10 % of the genome. ENU provides a powerful tool for exploring the genome-phenome relationship, however forward genetic applications that require the mutation to be passed on through the germ line may be limited to explore only genes that are accessible in testis. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |