↓ Skip to main content

Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Propensity-matched analysis of three different chemotherapy sequences in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1768-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Fei Li, Ying-Qin Li, Lei Chen, Yuan Zhang, Rui Guo, Fan Zhang, Hao Peng, Ying Sun, Jun Ma

Abstract

To compare the survival outcomes and acute toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), induction chemotherapy (IC) plus radiotherapy (RT), and IC plus CCRT in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Patients with stage III-IVB NPC who were treated with IMRT between 2009 and 2012 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The induction regimens included PF (cisplatin and fluorouracil) and TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) every 3 weeks for 2-3 cycles; the concurrent regimen was cisplatin every three weeks for 2-3 cycles. A propensity score matching method was used to match patients from each group in a 1:1:1 ratio. In total, 147 eligible patients were propensity-matched, with 49 patients in each treatment group. The median follow-up duration was 38.5 months (range, 4.5 - 56 months). The 3-year disease-free survival, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival rates were 82.1 %, 92.8 %, 87 %, and 90.4 % in the CCRT group; 86.3 %, 91.0 %, 91.6 %, and 94.4 % in the IC plus RT group; and 87.8 %, 95.8 %, 93.8 %, and 93.9 % in the IC plus CCRT group, respectively. No statistically significant survival differences were observed between the three treatment groups in either univariate or multivariate analyses. The incidence of grade 3-4 acute toxicities was similar among groups. This study suggests that CCRT, IC plus RT, and IC plus CCRT are similarly efficacious treatment strategies for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC treated using IMRT; however, long-term, large-scale randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%