You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cross-Sectional analysis of levels and patterns of objectively measured sedentary time in adolescent females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-8-120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deirdre M Harrington, Kieran P Dowd, Alan K Bourke, Alan E Donnelly |
| Abstract |
Adolescent females have been highlighted as a particularly sedentary population and the possible negative effects of a sedentary lifestyle are being uncovered. However, much of the past sedentary research is based on self-report or uses indirect methods to quantity sedentary time. Total time spent sedentary and the possible intricate sedentary patterns of adolescent females have not been described using objective and direct measure of body inclination. The objectives of this article are to examine the sedentary levels and patterns of a group of adolescent females using the ActivPAL™ and to highlight possible differences in sedentary levels and patterns across the week and within the school day. A full methodological description of how the data was analyzed is also presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Ireland | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 20% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,182,220
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#783
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,941
of 152,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.