↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of TaDREB1 in wheat genotypes with different seed germination under osmotic stress

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditas, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of TaDREB1 in wheat genotypes with different seed germination under osmotic stress
Published in
Hereditas, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41065-018-0064-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng Liu, Zeng Wang, Hong-mei Xiao, Yan Yang

Abstract

The cis-acting element DRE/CRT plays an important role in activating gene expression responsive to osmotic stress, low temperature and high-salinity. DREB1/CBF genes encode DRE-binding proteins with the function as transcript activators. TaDREB1 was also found to be induced by osmotic stress. The dates of osmotic stress was assessed by seed germination drought resistance index; the full-length cDNA sequences of TaDREB1 gene were downloaded from NCBI datebase; identification of allelic variation and transcript expression were assessed by PCR and semi-quantitive RT-PCR analysis, respectively. Total 13 new allele variations of TaDREB1 were identified in the germplasms tested in the paper, including 5 TaDREB1 -A on chromosome 3AL, 4 TaDREB1 -B on chromosome 3BL and 4 TaDREB1 -D on chromosome 3DL. In each variety, there existed two loci of TaDREB1-D genes, named TaDREB1-D1 and TaDREB1-D2, both of which had the similar nucleotide sequence except an 11 bp insertion in the former. In wheat seeds under osmotic stress, we did not detect the transcript expression level of TaDREB1-A and TaDREB1-B, but that of TaDREB1-D. The capacity of osmotic stress tolerance was closely correlated with the expression level and tendency of TaDREB1-D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Hereditas
#350
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,886
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditas
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.