↓ Skip to main content

Complement receptor 2 is up regulated in the spinal cord following nerve root injury and modulates the spinal cord response

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complement receptor 2 is up regulated in the spinal cord following nerve root injury and modulates the spinal cord response
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12974-015-0413-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rickard P. F. Lindblom, Alexander Berg, Mikael Ström, Shahin Aeinehband, Cecilia A. Dominguez, Faiez Al Nimer, Nada Abdelmagid, Matthias Heinig, Johan Zelano, Karin Harnesk, Norbert Hübner, Bo Nilsson, Kristina Nilsson Ekdahl, Margarita Diez, Staffan Cullheim, Fredrik Piehl

Abstract

Activation of the complement system has been implicated in both acute and chronic states of neurodegeneration. However, a detailed understanding of this complex network of interacting components is still lacking. Large-scale global expression profiling in a rat F2(DAxPVG) intercross identified a strong cis-regulatory influence on the local expression of complement receptor 2 (Cr2) in the spinal cord after ventral root avulsion (VRA). Expression of Cr2 in the spinal cord was studied in a separate cohort of DA and PVG rats at different time-points after VRA, and also following sciatic nerve transection (SNT) in the same strains. Consequently, Cr2 (-/-) mice and Wt controls were used to further explore the role of Cr2 in the spinal cord following SNT. The in vivo experiments were complemented by astrocyte and microglia cell cultures. Expression of Cr2 in naïve spinal cord was low but strongly up regulated at 5-7 days after both VRA and SNT. Levels of Cr2 expression, as well as astrocyte activation, was higher in PVG rats than DA rats following both VRA and SNT. Subsequent in vitro studies proposed astrocytes as the main source of Cr2 expression. A functional role for Cr2 is suggested by the finding that transgenic mice lacking Cr2 displayed increased loss of synaptic nerve terminals following nerve injury. We also detected increased levels of soluble CR2 (sCR2) in the cerebrospinal fluid of rats following VRA. These results demonstrate that local expression of Cr2 in the central nervous system is part of the axotomy reaction and is suggested to modulate subsequent complement mediated effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,776,263
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,945
of 2,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,659
of 284,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#38
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.