↓ Skip to main content

Differential characteristics of young and midlife adult users of psychotherapy, psychotropic medications, or both: information from a population representative sample in São Paulo, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential characteristics of young and midlife adult users of psychotherapy, psychotropic medications, or both: information from a population representative sample in São Paulo, Brazil
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0651-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio L. Blay, Gerda G. Fillenbaum, Erica T. Peluso

Abstract

While the personal characteristics of users of psychotherapy and/or psychotropic medications have been examined, direct user comparison of these treatment approaches appears to be rare. Our aim is to ascertain extent of receipt of these services, and identify basic distinguishing characteristics of users. Information on demographics, lifetime and past 12 month use of mental health services, and presence of common mental disorders (CMD), was gathered in 2002 using a multi-stage sampling procedure that yielded a population-representative, community-resident sample (N = 2000, age 18-65) for São Paulo, Brazil. Analysis used descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Overall, 9.3 % reported receiving psychotherapy and/or psychotropic medication, 54.3 % of whom did not meet CMD criteria. Of those meeting criteria for CMD (n = 455, 22.8 %), 2.9 % reported only psychotherapy, 10.1 % reported only psychotropic medication, and 5.7 % reported both. CMD was associated with use of psychotropic medication (psychotropic medication alone, Odds Ratio (OR) 3.58, 95 % CI 2.33-5.52; together with psychotherapy, OR 4.17, 95 % CI 2.34-7.44). CMD was not associated with use of psychotherapy. Users' distinguishing characteristics were: psychotherapy only-not married; psychotropics only-increasing age, female, not married; using both-only CMD status. Neither education nor income was associated with use. Nearly 10 % of all community residents age 18-65, but less than a fifth of the 23 % with CMD, received psychotherapy and/or psychotropic medication. Non-married status increased odds of all treatment types, but CMD presence increased only odds of psychotropic and combined psychotherapy/psychotropic use, with odds of psychotropic only use increasing with age, and for women. Use was equitable with respect to education and income.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 12 28%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 28%
Unspecified 6 14%
Psychology 6 14%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,099
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,214
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,737
of 284,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#84
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.