↓ Skip to main content

Adaptation costs for climate change-related cases of diarrhoeal disease, malnutrition, and malaria in 2030

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptation costs for climate change-related cases of diarrhoeal disease, malnutrition, and malaria in 2030
Published in
Globalization and Health, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-4-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristie L Ebi

Abstract

Climate change has begun to negatively affect human health, with larger burdens projected in the future as weather patterns continue to change. The climate change-related health consequences of diarrhoeal diseases, malnutrition, and malaria are projected to pose the largest risks to future populations. Limited work has been done to estimate the costs of adapting to these additional health burdens. The costs of treating diarrhoeal diseases, malnutrition (stunting and wasting only), and malaria in 2030 were estimated under three climate scenarios using (1) the current numbers of cases; (2) the projected relative risks of these diseases in 2030; and (3) current treatment costs. The analysis assumed that the number of annual cases and costs of treatment would remain constant. There was limited consideration of socioeconomic development. Under a scenario assuming emissions reductions resulting in stabilization at 750 ppm CO2 equivalent in 2210, the costs of treating diarrhoeal diseases, malnutrition, and malaria in 2030 were estimated to be $4 to 12 billion. This is almost as much as current total annual overseas development assistance for health. The investment needs in the health sector to address climate-sensitive health outcomes are large. Additional human and financial resources will be needed to prevent and control the projected increased burden of health outcomes due to climate change.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 18%
Social Sciences 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 31 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#591
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,131
of 98,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.