↓ Skip to main content

Prospecting major genes in dairy buffaloes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospecting major genes in dairy buffaloes
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1986-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

GMF de Camargo, RR Aspilcueta-Borquis, MRS Fortes, R. Porto-Neto, DF Cardoso, DJA Santos, SA Lehnert, A. Reverter, SS Moore, H. Tonhati

Abstract

Asian buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) have an important socio-economic role. The majority of the population is situated in developing countries. Due to the scarce resources in these countries, very few species-specific biotechnology tools exist and a lot of cattle-derived technologies are applied to buffaloes. However, the application of cattle genomic tools to buffaloes is not straightforward and, as results suggested, despite genome sequences similarity the genetic polymorphisms are different. The first SNP chip genotyping platform designed specifically for buffaloes has recently become available. Herein, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and gene network analysis carried out in buffaloes is presented. Target phenotypes were six milk production and four reproductive traits. GWAS identified SNP with significant associations and suggested candidate genes that were specific to each trait and also genes with pleiotropic effect, associated to multiple traits. Network predictions of interactions between these candidate genes may guide further molecular analyses in search of disruptive mutations, help select genes for functional experiments and evidence metabolism differences in comparison to cattle. The cattle SNP chip does not offer an optimal coverage of buffalo genome, thereafter the development of new buffalo-specific genetic technologies is warranted. An annotated reference genome would greatly facilitate genetic research, with potential impact to buffalo-based dairy production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
India 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 40%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,183
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,920
of 284,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#332
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.