↓ Skip to main content

Incidence and determinants of neonatal morbidity after elective caesarean section at the national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence and determinants of neonatal morbidity after elective caesarean section at the national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda
Published in
BMC Research Notes, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1617-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annettee Nakimuli, Sarah Nakubulwa, Othman Kakaire, Michael O. Osinde, Scovia N. Mbalinda, Rose C. Nabirye, Nelson Kakande, Dan K. Kaye

Abstract

Elective caesarean sections (ECS) have been implicated in increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. The primary objective was to assess the incidence and determinants of neonatal morbidity after elective caesarean section deliveries. The secondary objective was to describe the maternal morbidity associated with elective caesarean section. This was a prospective cohort study of women admitted for ECS, as well as their newborns, conducted at Mulago hospital from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2014. These were followed from the time of the operation until 6 weeks after hospitalization following the caesarean delivery. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and review of medical records for demographic characteristics, obstetric history, current pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcomes up to hospital discharge. Study outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. The data was analyzed using Stata version 12. There were 25,846 deliveries during the study period, of which 20,083 (77.7 %) were vaginal deliveries or assisted deliveries, and 5763 (22.3 %) were caesarean sections. Of the caesarean sections, 920 (15.9 %) were ECS. The commonest maternal morbidity was hemorrhage (17.2 %). A birth weight less than 2500 g (aRR 11.0 [95 % CI 8.1-17.2]) or more than 4000 g (aRR 12.2 [95 % CI 10.6-23.2]), delivery at gestation age less than or equal to 38 weeks (aRR 1.62 [95 % 1.20-2.10]), multigravidity (aRR 1.70 [95 % CI 1.20-2.90]) and using general anaesthesia (aRR 2.43 [95 % CI 1.20-5.90]) were associated with risk of neonatal morbidity. The commonest neonatal morbidity is respiratory distress especially if delivery occurs at a gestation age of 37 weeks or lower, if the birth weight is less than 2500 g or more than 4000 g, and if general anesthesia is used. Our study shows that at Mulago Hospital, ECS is associated with significant neonatal and maternal morbidity. We recommend that elective caesarean sections be performed after 39 weeks of gestation, and preferably avoid using general anaesthesia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,302,839
of 23,905,640 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#445
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,439
of 288,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#12
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.