You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of conservative treatment regimes for hip osteoarthritis - Evaluation of the therapeutic exercise regime "Hip School": A protocol for a randomised, controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inga Krauss, Benjamin Steinhilber, Georg Haupt, Regina Miller, Stefan Grau, Pia Janssen |
| Abstract |
Hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) is a disease with a major impact on both national economy and the patients themselves. Patients suffer from pain and functional impairment in activities of daily life which are associated with a decrease in quality of life. Conservative therapeutic interventions such as physical exercises aim at reducing pain and increasing function and health-related quality of life. However, there is only silver level evidence for efficacy of land-based physical exercise in the treatment of hip OA. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the specific 12-week exercise regime "Hip School" can decrease bodily pain and improve physical function and life quality in subjects with hip osteoarthritis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 20% |
| Unknown | 99 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 41 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 114 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,690,174
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,561
of 4,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,622
of 242,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.