You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Kerpedjiev, Nezar Abdennur, Fritz Lekschas, Chuck McCallum, Kasper Dinkla, Hendrik Strobelt, Jacob M. Luber, Scott B. Ouellette, Alaleh Azhir, Nikhil Kumar, Jeewon Hwang, Soohyun Lee, Burak H. Alver, Hanspeter Pfister, Leonid A. Mirny, Peter J. Park, Nils Gehlenborg |
| Abstract |
We present HiGlass, an open source visualization tool built on web technologies that provides a rich interface for rapid, multiplex, and multiscale navigation of 2D genomic maps alongside 1D genomic tracks, allowing users to combine various data types, synchronize multiple visualization modalities, and share fully customizable views with others. We demonstrate its utility in exploring different experimental conditions, comparing the results of analyses, and creating interactive snapshots to share with collaborators and the broader public. HiGlass is accessible online at http://higlass.io and is also available as a containerized application that can be run on any platform. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 64 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 9% |
| Germany | 10 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Austria | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 93 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 79 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 23% |
| Researcher | 50 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 102 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 66 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#370,785
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#177
of 4,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,880
of 342,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.