You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0512-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabina Alam, Jigisha Patel |
| Abstract |
This editorial introduces a series of tutorials by experts, who provide tips and advice for junior reviewers on how to conduct peer review based on specific study designs. The aim of these articles is to provide an easy-to-use, quick reference for those who are seeking more guidance on how to peer review biomedical research papers. Unlike previous tips and guides on peer review, this series is the first to provide advice from experts for those in their specific fields. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 24% |
| United States | 8 | 20% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 46% |
| Scientists | 12 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,228,960
of 23,971,024 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#856
of 3,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,272
of 288,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,971,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.