↓ Skip to main content

Autologous immuno magnetically selected CD133+ stem cells in the treatment of no-option critical limb ischemia: clinical and contrast enhanced ultrasound assessed results in eight patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autologous immuno magnetically selected CD133+ stem cells in the treatment of no-option critical limb ischemia: clinical and contrast enhanced ultrasound assessed results in eight patients
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0697-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vittorio Arici, Cesare Perotti, Calliada Fabrizio, Claudia Del Fante, Franco Ragni, Francesco Alessandrino, Gianluca Viarengo, Michele Pagani, Alessia Moia, Carmine Tinelli, Antonio Bozzani

Abstract

Demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of highly purified CD133+ autologous stem cells in critical limb ischemia (CLI). Prospective single-center not randomized. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01595776 METHODS: Eight patients with a history of stable CLI were enrolled in a period of 2 years. After bone marrow stimulation and single leukapheresis collection, CD133+ immunomagnetic cell selection was performed. CD133+ cells in buffer phosphate suspension was administered intramuscularly. Muscular and arterial contrast enhanced ultra sound (CEUS), lesion evolution and pain management were assessed preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months after the implant. No patient had early or late complications related to the procedure. Two patients (25 %) didn't get any relief from the treatment and underwent major amputation. Six patients (75 %) had a complete healing of the wounds, rest pain cessation and walking recovery. An increase in CEUS values was shown in all eight patients at 6 months and in the six clinical healed patients at 12 months and had statistical relevance. Highly purified autologous CD133+ cells can stimulate neo-angiogenesis, as based on clinical and CEUS data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,240,471
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,783
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,832
of 285,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#26
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.