The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of clinical services provided by community pharmacies on the Australian healthcare system: a review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-018-0149-7 |
| Authors |
Vera H. Buss, Alison Shield, Sam Kosari, Mark Naunton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 34 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,137,809
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#91
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,241
of 348,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.