You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors affecting fistula failure in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a population–based case–control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nephrology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12882-018-1010-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheng-Chieh Yen, Ching-Fang Tsai, Yueh-Yun Luo, Hsin-Yi Yang, Mei-Yin Liu, Peir-Haur Hung, Yueh-Han Hsu |
| Abstract |
With advancement of hemodialysis (HD) technique, late fistula failure (LFF) remains a problem significantly affecting life quality of patients. We attempt to identify factors affecting LFF in patients on chronic HD in Taiwan from the National Health Insurance Research Database. This case-control study enrolled patients over 18 years old and who received regular HD for more than 3 months. LFF was defined as the first fistula failure episode beyond 3 months of chronic HD. We analyzed characteristics, comorbidities and medicine and investigated the association factors of LFF by logistic regression model. A trend test was conducted for risk in different provider levels. Sensitivity tests were conducted to test consistency. Of 1558 patients recruited, 772 (49.6%) were identified as LFF cases and 786 were identified as controls. The data showed that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) had 42% increased rate of LFF. Patients receiving more than 10 HD sessions per month had a 90% increased rate of LFF; patients receiving chronic HD in private clinics had a 49% reduction rate of LFF. There were no significant differences in age, dialysis frequency, and comorbidities among different provider levels. There was a significant trend of risk reduction of the event from medical centers, regional hospitals, district hospitals, to private clinics. The sensitivity tests revealed similar results. The factors associated with LFF include DM and receiving more HD sessions; on the contrary, receiving HD in private clinics is associated with less risk of LFF. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 22% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,424,488
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,239
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,617
of 334,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.