↓ Skip to main content

Improving social gaze behavior in fragile X syndrome using a behavioral skills training approach: a proof of concept study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving social gaze behavior in fragile X syndrome using a behavioral skills training approach: a proof of concept study
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s11689-018-9243-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin E. Gannon, Tobias C. Britton, Ellen H. Wilkinson, Scott S. Hall

Abstract

Individuals diagnosed with fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common known inherited form of intellectual disability, commonly exhibit significant impairments in social gaze behavior during interactions with others. Although this behavior can restrict social development and limit educational opportunities, behavioral interventions designed to improve social gaze behavior have not been developed for this population. In this proof of concept (PoC) study, we examined whether administering a behavioral skills training package-discrete trial instruction (DTI) plus relaxation training-could increase social gaze duration in males with FXS. As part of a larger clinical trial, 20 boys with FXS, aged 8 to 18 years, were randomized to receive DTI plus relaxation training administered at one of two prescribed doses over a 2-day period at our research center. Potential improvements in social gaze behavior were evaluated by direct observations conducted across trials during the training, and generalization effects were examined by administering a social challenge before and after the treatment. During the social challenge, social gaze behavior was recorded using an eye tracker and physiological arousal levels were simultaneously recorded by monitoring the child's heart rate. Levels of social gaze behavior increased significantly across blocks of training trials for six (60%) boys who received the high-dose behavioral treatment and for three (30%) boys who received the low-dose behavioral treatment. Boys who received the high-dose treatment also showed greater improvements in social gaze behavior during the social challenge compared to boys who received the low-dose treatment. There was no effect of the treatment on physiological arousal levels recorded on the heart rate monitor at either dose. These results suggest that appropriate social gaze behavior can be successfully taught to boys with FXS using a standardized behavioral skills training approach. Future studies will need to evaluate whether younger children with FXS might benefit from this treatment, and/or whether more naturalistic forms of behavioral skills training might be beneficial, before social gaze avoidance becomes established in the child's repertoire. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02616796 . Registered 30 November 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 27%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,276,174
of 24,689,476 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#359
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,828
of 339,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,689,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.