↓ Skip to main content

Safety of allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in renal transplant recipients: the neptune study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety of allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in renal transplant recipients: the neptune study
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0700-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlies E. J. Reinders, Geertje J. Dreyer, Jonna R. Bank, Helene Roelofs, Sebastiaan Heidt, Dave L. Roelen, Maarten L. Zandvliet, Volkert A. L. Huurman, Wim E. Fibbe, Cees van Kooten, Frans H. J. Claas, Ton J. Rabelink, Johan W. de Fijter

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) may serve as an attractive therapy in renal transplantation due to their immunosuppressive and reparative properties. While most studies have used autologous MSCs, allogeneic MSCs offer the advantage of immediate availability for clinical use. This is of major importance for indications where instant treatment is needed, for example allograft rejection or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Clinical studies using allogeneic MSCs are limited in number. Although these studies showed no adverse reactions, allogeneic MSCs could possibly elicit an anti-donor immune response, which may increase the incidence of rejection and impact the allograft survival in the long term. These safety issues should be addressed before further studies are planned with allogeneic MSCs in the solid organ transplant setting. 10 renal allograft recipients, 18-75 years old, will be included in this clinical phase Ib, open label, single center study. Patients will receive two doses of 1.5 × 10(6) per/kg body weight allogeneic bone marrow derived MSCs intravenously, at 25 and 26 weeks after transplantation, when immune suppression levels are reduced. The primary end point of this study is safety by assessing biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR)/graft loss after MSC treatment. Secondary end points, all measured before and after MSC infusions, include: comparison of fibrosis in renal biopsy by quantitative Sirius Red scoring; de novo HLA antibody development and extensive immune monitoring; renal function measured by cGFR and iohexol clearance; CMV and BK infection and other opportunistic infections. This study will provide information on the safety of allogeneic MSC infusion and its effect on the incidence of BPAR/graft loss. NCT02387151.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,546,155
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#851
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,958
of 285,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#11
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.