↓ Skip to main content

Clinical significance of radiological pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis pattern in interstitial lung disease patients registered for lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical significance of radiological pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis pattern in interstitial lung disease patients registered for lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Respiratory Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12931-018-0860-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiminobu Tanizawa, Tomohiro Handa, Takeshi Kubo, Toyofumi F. Chen-Yoshikawa, Akihiro Aoyama, Hideki Motoyama, Kyoko Hijiya, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Yohei Oshima, Kohei Ikezoe, Shinsaku Tokuda, Yoshinari Nakatsuka, Yuko Murase, Sonoko Nagai, Shigeo Muro, Toru Oga, Kazuo Chin, Toyohiro Hirai, Hiroshi Date

Abstract

Radiological pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) lesion is characterized by pleural thickening with associated signs of subpleural fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). This study evaluated the clinical significance of radiological PPFE as an isolated finding or associated with other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in patients having fibrotic ILDs and registered for cadaveric lung transplantation (LT). This retrospective study included 118 fibrotic ILD patients registered for LT. Radiological PPFE on HRCT was assessed. The impact of radiological PPFE on clinical features and transplantation-censored survival were evaluated. Radiological PPFE was observed in 30/118 cases (25%): definite PPFE (PPFE concentrated in the upper lobes, with involvement of lower lobes being less marked) in 12 (10%) and consistent PPFE (PPFE not concentrated in the upper lobes, or PPFE with features of coexistent disease present elsewhere) in 18 (15%). Of these, 12 had late-onset non-infectious pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and/or chemotherapy (LONIPCs), 9 idiopathic PPFE, and 9 other fibrotic ILDs (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, IPF; other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, other IIPs; connective tissue disease-associated ILD, CTD-ILD, and hypersensitivity pneumonia, HP). Radiological PPFE was associated with previous history of pneumothorax, lower body mass index, lower percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), higher percentage of predicted diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, less desaturation on six-minute walk test, and hypercapnia. The median survival time of all study cases was 449 days. Thirty-seven (28%) received LTs: cadaveric in 31 and living-donor lobar in six. Of 93 patients who did not receive LT, 66 (71%) died. Radiological PPFE was marginally associated with better survival after adjustment for age, sex, %FVC, and six-minute walk distance < 250 m (hazard ratio 0.51 [0.25-1.05], p = 0.07). After adjustment for covariates, idiopathic PPFE and LONIPC with radiological PPFE was associated with better survival than fibrotic ILDs without radiological PPFE (hazard ratio 0.38 [0.16-0.90], p = 0.03), and marginally better survival than other fibrotic ILDs with radiological PPFE (hazard ratio, 0.20 [0.04-1.11], p = 0.07). idiopathic PPFE and LONIPC with radiological PPFE has better survival on the wait list for LT than fibrotic ILDs without radiological PPFE, after adjustment for age, sex, %FVC, and six-minute walk distance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,055
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,027
of 344,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#44
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.