↓ Skip to main content

Women’s experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women’s experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1804-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farhana Sultana, Robyn Mullins, Dallas R. English, Julie A. Simpson, Kelly T. Drennan, Stella Heley, C. David Wrede, Julia M. L. Brotherton, Marion Saville, Dorota M. Gertig

Abstract

Increasing cervical screening coverage by reaching inadequately screened groups is essential for improving the effectiveness of cervical screening programs. Offering HPV self-sampling to women who are never or under-screened can improve screening participation, however participation varies widely between settings. Information on women's experience with self-sampling and preferences for future self-sampling screening is essential for programs to optimize participation. The survey was conducted as part of a larger trial ("iPap") investigating the effect of HPV self-sampling on participation of never and under-screened women in Victoria, Australia. Questionnaires were mailed to a) most women who participated in the self-sampling to document their experience with and preference for self-sampling in future, and b) a sample of the women who did not participate asking reasons for non-participation and suggestions for enabling participation. Reasons for not having a previous Pap test were also explored. About half the women who collected a self sample for the iPap trial returned the subsequent questionnaire (746/1521). Common reasons for not having cervical screening were that having Pap test performed by a doctor was embarrassing (18 %), not having the time (14 %), or that a Pap test was painful and uncomfortable (11 %). Most (94 %) found the home-based self-sampling less embarrassing, less uncomfortable (90 %) and more convenient (98 %) compared with their last Pap test experience (if they had one); however, many were unsure about the test accuracy (57 %). Women who self-sampled thought the instructions were clear (98 %), it was easy to use the swab (95 %), and were generally confident that they did the test correctly (81 %). Most preferred to take the self-sample at home in the future (88 %) because it was simple and did not require a doctor's appointment. Few women (126/1946, 7 %) who did not return a self-sample in the iPap trial returned the questionnaire. Their main reason for not screening was having had a hysterectomy. Home-based self-sampling can overcome emotional and practical barriers to Pap test and increase participation in cervical screening despite some women's concerns about test accuracy. Mailing to eligible women and assuring women about test accuracy could further optimize participation in screening.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 32 30%