↓ Skip to main content

Sleep as a biological problem: an overview of frontiers in sleep research

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 321)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep as a biological problem: an overview of frontiers in sleep research
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12576-015-0414-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Kanda, Natsuko Tsujino, Eriko Kuramoto, Yoshimasa Koyama, Etsuo A. Susaki, Sachiko Chikahisa, Hiromasa Funato

Abstract

Sleep is a physiological process not only for the rest of the body but also for several brain functions such as mood, memory, and consciousness. Nevertheless, the nature and functions of sleep remain largely unknown due to its extremely complicated nature and lack of optimized technology for the experiments. Here we review the recent progress in the biology of the mammalian sleep, which covers a wide range of research areas: the basic knowledge about sleep, the physiology of cerebral cortex in sleeping animals, the detailed morphological features of thalamocortical networks, the mechanisms underlying fluctuating activity of autonomic nervous systems during rapid eye movement sleep, the cutting-edge technology of tissue clearing for visualization of the whole brain, the ketogenesis-mediated homeostatic regulation of sleep, and the forward genetic approach for identification of novel genes involved in sleep. We hope this multifaceted review will be helpful for researchers who are interested in the biology of sleep.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 24%
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,935,519
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#48
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,756
of 289,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.