↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with delays in seeking post abortion care among women in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with delays in seeking post abortion care among women in Kenya
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0660-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael M. Mutua, Beatrice W. Maina, Thomas O. Achia, Chimaraoke O. Izugbara

Abstract

Delays in seeking quality post abortion care services remain a major contributor to high levels of mortality and morbidity among women who experience unsafe abortion. However, little is known about the causes of and factors associated with delays in seeking care among women who suffer complications of unsafe abortion. This study looks at factors that are associated with delays in seeking post-abortion care among women in Kenya. Data for this study were from a nationally representative sample of 350 healthcare facilities that participated in the 2012 Incidence and Magnitude of Unsafe Abortion study in Kenya. Data included socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive health and clinical histories from all women treated with PAC during a one-month data collection period. Delay in seeking care was associated with women's age, education level, contraceptive history, fertility intentions and referral status. There is need to improve women's access to quality sexual and reproductive health information and services, contraception and abortion care. Improving current PAC services at lower level facilities will also minimize delays resulting from long referral processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 64 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 18%
Social Sciences 27 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 63 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,088
of 4,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,752
of 278,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#47
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.