↓ Skip to main content

Predicting drug side effects by multi-label learning and ensemble learning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting drug side effects by multi-label learning and ensemble learning
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0774-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen Zhang, Feng Liu, Longqiang Luo, Jingxia Zhang

Abstract

Predicting drug side effects is an important topic in the drug discovery. Although several machine learning methods have been proposed to predict side effects, there is still space for improvements. Firstly, the side effect prediction is a multi-label learning task, and we can adopt the multi-label learning techniques for it. Secondly, drug-related features are associated with side effects, and feature dimensions have specific biological meanings. Recognizing critical dimensions and reducing irrelevant dimensions may help to reveal the causes of side effects. In this paper, we propose a novel method 'feature selection-based multi-label k-nearest neighbor method' (FS-MLKNN), which can simultaneously determine critical feature dimensions and construct high-accuracy multi-label prediction models. Computational experiments demonstrate that FS-MLKNN leads to good performances as well as explainable results. To achieve better performances, we further develop the ensemble learning model by integrating individual feature-based FS-MLKNN models. When compared with other state-of-the-art methods, the ensemble method produces better performances on benchmark datasets. In conclusion, FS-MLKNN and the ensemble method are promising tools for the side effect prediction. The source code and datasets are available in the Additional file 1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 38 32%
Engineering 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Chemistry 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,530,487
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,453
of 7,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,993
of 286,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#47
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.