Title |
Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-015-0727-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hai-Tao Huang, Fei Wang, Liang Shen, Chun-Qiu Xia, Chen-Xi Lu, Chong-Jun Zhong |
Abstract |
In China, the middle esophageal squamous cell cancer is the most common tumor type, and Mckeown esophagectomy (ME) is preferably adopted by thoracic surgeon. But, the surgical trauma of ME is great. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TE) was developed to decrease the operative stress; however, the safety and efficacy were not defined. In this study, clinical outcomes were compared between patients who received ME and TE. The data of 113 patients who suffered from middle-thoracic esophageal cancer during the same period were collected. Sixty-two patients received ME (ME group), and 51 patients received TE (TE group). Patients' demographics and short-term clinicopathologic outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between groups were performed with log-rank test. Patients in TE group had lower body mass index (BMI). Preoperative tumor stage in TE group was much earlier. Both overall and thoracic operation time were longer in TE group. The blood loss during operation and postoperative day (POD) 1 was less in TE group, which contributed to the less blood transfusion. In TE group, postoperative incidence of pulmonary complications and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.035 and p = 0.033) was lower; the inflammatory response and incision pain were significantly alleviated; the ICU and in-hospital stay was shorter as well because of less surgical trauma. No statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of overall survival or disease-free survival. The efficacy and safety of TE were supported by the selected patients in this cohort study. Although it is lack of randomness in this research, some advantages of TE were gratifying such as lower postoperative complications and similar survival with ME. A multicenter prospective randomized study is now required. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 56% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 31% |