↓ Skip to main content

Crowdsourced direct-to-consumer genomic analysis of a family quartet

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
62 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crowdsourced direct-to-consumer genomic analysis of a family quartet
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1973-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Corpas, Willy Valdivia-Granda, Nazareth Torres, Bastian Greshake, Alain Coletta, Alexej Knaus, Andrew P. Harrison, Mike Cariaso, Federico Moran, Fiona Nielsen, Daniel Swan, David Y. Weiss Solís, Peter Krawitz, Frank Schacherer, Peter Schols, Huangming Yang, Pascal Borry, Gustavo Glusman, Peter N. Robinson

Abstract

We describe the pioneering experience of a Spanish family pursuing the goal of understanding their own personal genetic data to the fullest possible extent using Direct to Consumer (DTC) tests. With full informed consent from the Corpas family, all genotype, exome and metagenome data from members of this family, are publicly available under a public domain Creative Commons 0 (CC0) license waiver. All scientists or companies analysing these data ("the Corpasome") were invited to return results to the family. We released 5 genotypes, 4 exomes, 1 metagenome from the Corpas family via a blog and figshare under a public domain license, inviting scientists to join the crowdsourcing efforts to analyse the genomes in return for coauthorship or acknowldgement in derived papers. Resulting analysis data were compiled via social media and direct email. Here we present the results of our investigations, combining the crowdsourced contributions and our own efforts. Four companies offering annotations for genomic variants were applied to four family exomes: BIOBASE, Ingenuity, Diploid, and GeneTalk. Starting from a common VCF file and after selecting for significant results from company reports, we find no overlap among described annotations. We additionally report on a gut microbiome analysis of a member of the Corpas family. This study presents an analysis of a diverse set of tools and methods offered by four DTC companies. The striking discordance of the results mirrors previous findings with respect to DTC analysis of SNP chip data, and highlights the difficulties of using DTC data for preventive medical care. To our knowledge, the data and analysis results from our crowdsourced study represent the most comprehensive exome and analysis for a family quartet using solely DTC data generation to date.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 98 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Other 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Computer Science 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#805,737
of 24,981,585 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#100
of 11,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,247
of 292,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#6
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,981,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.