You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Zoology, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-9994-7-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Richter, Rudi Loesel, Günter Purschke, Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa, Gerhard Scholtz, Thomas Stach, Lars Vogt, Andreas Wanninger, Georg Brenneis, Carmen Döring, Simone Faller, Martin Fritsch, Peter Grobe, Carsten M Heuer, Sabrina Kaul, Ole S Møller, Carsten HG Müller, Verena Rieger, Birgen H Rothe, Martin EJ Stegner, Steffen Harzsch |
| Abstract |
Invertebrate nervous systems are highly disparate between different taxa. This is reflected in the terminology used to describe them, which is very rich and often confusing. Even very general terms such as 'brain', 'nerve', and 'eye' have been used in various ways in the different animal groups, but no consensus on the exact meaning exists. This impedes our understanding of the architecture of the invertebrate nervous system in general and of evolutionary transformations of nervous system characters between different taxa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 290 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 22% |
| Researcher | 65 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 11% |
| Professor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 193 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#334
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,944
of 111,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.