The current status of malaria epidemiology in Bolifamba, atypical Cameroonian rainforest zone: an assessment of intervention strategies and seasonal variations
Raymond Babila Nyasa, Denis Zofou, Helen Kuokuo Kimbi, Karin Mbei Kum, Roland C. Ngu, Vincent P. K. Titanji
Abstract
Global malaria has been on the decline over the past decade due to expansion of interventions. The present study aimed at determining the current status of malaria epidemiology in the context of sustained interventions and seasonal variations in Bolifamba, which represents a typical semi-urban malaria endemic community in the Cameroonian rainforest.
A monthly cross-sectional survey was carried out in Bolifamba, a multi ethnic semi-urban locality on the eastern flanks of Mt Cameroon, for a year during which blood samples were collected from participants and examined for malaria parasites by microscopy. Correlation analysis of seasonal/monthly malaria prevalence was done with weather data from Ekona, a nearby village with a meteorological station. Intervention strategy such as use of Insecticide Treated Bed Net (ITBN) and risk factors such as duration of stay in the locality, age and housing type were also investigated.
The results revealed a malaria prevalence of 38.3 % in the rainy season, which was significantly higher than 24.4 % observed in the dry season (P < 0.0001). A high prevalence of asymptomatic malaria which was more than double the prevalence of symptomatic malaria on a monthly basis was observed, 30.7 % vs 17.8 % in the rainy and dry season respectively (p < 0.0001) and asymptomatic malaria was significantly associated with anemia (p < 0.005). April was the peak month of malaria prevalence and coincided with peak periods of both asymptomatic and symptomatic malaria. The Plasmodium falciparum parasite rates in the 2- up to 10-years age group (PfPR(2-10)) was 40.8 %. The regular use of ITBN was significantly associated with low prevalence of 31.7 % as opposed to irregular or non-usage of ITBN 38.2 % (p < 0.05). Log of parasite load was found to initially increase to 2.49 with less than 5 years of stay, and decreased gradually with increasing duration of stay in the locality (p = 0.046). Climatic factors were significantly and positively associated with monthly malaria prevalence and the strongest predictors of malaria prevalence were rainfall and minimum temperature with r values of 0.563 and 0.6 respectively.
The study highlights the role of seasonal change in modifying malaria prevalence during the year and the beneficial effect of ITBN. It also underscores a sublime problem of asymptomatic malaria associated with anemia, and indicates that partial immunity is acquired with prolonged stay in Bolifamba. This preliminary result is the basis of ongoing work to identify the antigens involved in acquired immunity.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,700,486
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,811
of 14,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,764
of 285,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#181
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
