↓ Skip to main content

New players in the preventive treatment of migraine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New players in the preventive treatment of migraine
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0522-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimos D. Mitsikostas, Alan M. Rapoport

Abstract

Migraine is a common, chronic disorder of the brain causing much disability, as well as personal, familial and societal impact. Several oral preventive agents are available in different countries for the prevention of migraine, but none have performed better than 50 % improvement in 50 % of patients in a clinical trial. Additionally, each has various possible adverse events making their tolerability less than optimal. Recently, three monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) ligand (LY2951742, ALD403 and TEV-48125) and one targeting the CGRP receptor (AMG 334) have completed phase 2 trials, and the results have been reported. These early results show them all to be somewhat more effective than placebo, with no serious adverse events. Three have been studied for episodic migraine, and only TEV-48125 has been studied for both high frequency episodic and chronic migraine. Moreover, preliminary data suggests that neurostimulation is effective in migraine treatment, including stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion, transcutaneous supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve, and transcutaneous vagus nerve. In this article, these innovative therapies will be reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 20%
Other 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,557,950
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,102
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,462
of 294,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.