↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetics and male reproduction: the consequences of paternal lifestyle on fertility, embryo development, and children lifetime health

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetics and male reproduction: the consequences of paternal lifestyle on fertility, embryo development, and children lifetime health
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13148-015-0155-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liborio Stuppia, Marica Franzago, Patrizia Ballerini, Valentina Gatta, Ivana Antonucci

Abstract

The correlation between epigenetics and human reproduction represents a very interesting field of study, mainly due to the possible transgenerational effects related to epigenetic modifications of male and female gametes. In the present review, we focused our attention to the role played by epigenetics on male reproduction, evidencing at least four different levels at which sperm epigenetic modifications could affect reproduction: (1) spermatogenesis failure; (2) embryo development; (3) outcome of assisted reproduction technique (ART) protocols, mainly as concerning genomic imprinting; and (4) long-term effects during the offspring lifetime. The environmental agents responsible for epigenetic modifications are also examined, suggesting that the control of paternal lifestyle prior to conception could represent in the next future a novel hot topic in the management of human reproduction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 288 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 16%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 92 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,667,470
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#174
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,979
of 294,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.