↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes to prevent diabetes based on an example from Germany: Markov modelling

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes to prevent diabetes based on an example from Germany: Markov modelling
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-9-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Neumann, Peter Schwarz, Lars Lindholm

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) poses a large worldwide burden for health care systems. One possible tool to decrease this burden is primary prevention. As it is unethical to wait until perfect data are available to conclude whether T2D primary prevention intervention programmes are cost-effective, we need a model that simulates the effect of prevention initiatives. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the long-term cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes for the prevention of T2D using a Markov model. As decision makers often face difficulties in applying health economic results, we visualise our results with health economic tools.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 22%
Psychology 18 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 13%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 26 19%