↓ Skip to main content

A lateral approach defect closure technique with deep fascia flap for valgus knee TKA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A lateral approach defect closure technique with deep fascia flap for valgus knee TKA
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0316-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Jiang, Julio C Fernandes

Abstract

Routinely, we use a midline skin incision and lateral parapatellar approach of the knee to perform valgus knee TKA (total knee arthroplasty). It is generally very difficult to close the lateral capsular defect after valgus knee TKA, especially for severe valgus and flexion knee deformity. We describe a new surgical technique to close the lateral capsular defect with a deep fascia flap. From 2009 to 2012, we used the new technique to close lateral capsular defects for nine valgus TKA in eight patients. The wound healing, infection, range of motion, and postoperative X-ray Laurien view were evaluated. According to follow-up, we found that this technique can reduce the risk of intra- and postoperative complications (exposure of knee prosthesis, larger subcutaneous hematoma, poor wound healing, and higher risk of infection) and improve clinical outcome of total knee replacement (good range of motion and patellar tracking). There is no need for lateral parapatellar capsule Z-plasty during incision or filling the distal capsular defect with fat pad or composite meniscal-capsular-fat pad. Closing lateral capsular defect with a deep fascia flap for valgus knee TKA through a lateral parapatellar approach is a new and effective surgical technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1,167
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,863
of 282,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.