You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Inter-observer variation in LV analysis in a dedicated CMR unit: the impact of audit and consensus guideline on reproducibility
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, January 2014
Richard Coulden, Emer Sonnex
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||14%|
|Student > Master||1||14%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||57%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||14%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 312,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.