↓ Skip to main content

Inter-observer variation in LV analysis in a dedicated CMR unit: the impact of audit and consensus guideline on reproducibility

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inter-observer variation in LV analysis in a dedicated CMR unit: the impact of audit and consensus guideline on reproducibility
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-p372
Authors

Richard Coulden, Emer Sonnex

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,261,664
of 26,109,760 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,200
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,414
of 323,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,109,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.