↓ Skip to main content

Persistent androgen receptor addiction in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistent androgen receptor addiction in castration-resistant prostate cancer
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13045-015-0225-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T. Schweizer, Evan Y. Yu

Abstract

It is now understood that persistent activation of the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway often underlies the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This realization led to renewed interest in targeting the AR and ultimately to the development of the potent next-generation AR-directed agents abiraterone and enzalutamide. While these drugs prolong survival in men with CRPC, they are unfortunately not curative. Perhaps not surprisingly, evidence points to persistent AR signaling as one of the key drivers by which resistances to these agents develops. In this context, activation of the AR signaling program can occur through a number of molecular adaptations, including alterations leading to persistent canonical AR signaling (e.g., AR amplification/overexpression, elucidations/concentration of intratumoral androgens), activation of the AR program via feedback pathways (e.g., AKT/mTOR/Pi3K, HER2/Neu), and activation of the AR program via mutation or substitution (e.g., AR ligand binding domain mutation; AR splice variants; glucocorticoid receptor signaling). This review will provide an overview of the more clinical relevant (i.e., druggable) pathways that have been implicated in the emergence of drug resistance in men with CRPC and highlight some of the ongoing efforts towards developing therapeutics to impair these mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#1,036
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,072
of 281,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.