You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Genome Russia project: closing the largest remaining omission on the world Genome map
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13742-015-0095-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taras K. Oleksyk, Vladimir Brukhin, Stephen J. O’Brien |
| Abstract |
We are witnessing the great era of genome exploration of the world, as genetic variation in people is being detailed across multiple varied world populations in an effort unprecedented since the first human genome sequence appeared in 2001. However, these efforts have yet to produce a comprehensive mapping of humankind, because important regions of modern human civilization remain unexplored. The Genome Russia Project promises to fill one of the largest gaps, the expansive regions across the Russian Federation, informing not just medical genomics of the territories, but also the migration settlements of historic and pre-historic Eurasian peoples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 55% |
| Scientists | 15 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 26% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 30% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#560,186
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#51
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,248
of 292,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.