↓ Skip to main content

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients using fluorescence navigation with indocyanine green

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients using fluorescence navigation with indocyanine green
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-9-157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kei Aoyama, Takako Kamio, Tetsuya Ohchi, Masako Nishizawa, Shingo Kameoka

Abstract

There are various methods for detecting sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using a vital dye is a convenient and safe, intraoperatively preparative method to assess lymph node status. However, the disadvantage of the dye method is that the success rate of sentinel lymph node detection depend on the surgeon's skills and preoperative mapping of the sentinel lymph node is not feasible. Currently, a vital dye, radioisotope, or a combination of both is used to detect sentinel nodes. Many surgeons have reported successful results using either method. In this study we have analyzed breast lymphatic drainage pathways using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2011.
All research outputs
#6,909,831
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#200
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,034
of 239,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.