↓ Skip to main content

misFinder: identify mis-assemblies in an unbiased manner using reference and paired-end reads

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
misFinder: identify mis-assemblies in an unbiased manner using reference and paired-end reads
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0818-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Zhu, Henry C. M. Leung, Rongjie Wang, Francis Y. L. Chin, Siu Ming Yiu, Guangri Quan, Yajie Li, Rui Zhang, Qinghua Jiang, Bo Liu, Yucui Dong, Guohui Zhou, Yadong Wang

Abstract

Because of the short read length of high throughput sequencing data, assembly errors are introduced in genome assembly, which may have adverse impact to the downstream data analysis. Several tools have been developed to eliminate these errors by either 1) comparing the assembled sequences with some similar reference genome, or 2) analyzing paired-end reads aligned to the assembled sequences and determining inconsistent features alone mis-assembled sequences. However, the former approach cannot distinguish real structural variations between the target genome and the reference genome while the latter approach could have many false positive detections (correctly assembled sequence being considered as mis-assembled sequence). We present misFinder, a tool that aims to identify the assembly errors with high accuracy in an unbiased way and correct these errors at their mis-assembled positions to improve the assembly accuracy for downstream analysis. It combines the information of reference (or close related reference) genome and aligned paired-end reads to the assembled sequence. Assembly errors and correct assemblies corresponding to structural variations can be detected by comparing the genome reference and assembled sequence. Different types of assembly errors can then be distinguished from the mis-assembled sequence by analyzing the aligned paired-end reads using multiple features derived from coverage and consistence of insert distance to obtain high confident error calls. We tested the performance of misFinder on both simulated and real paired-end reads data, and misFinder gave accurate error calls with only very few miscalls. And, we further compared misFinder with QUAST and REAPR. misFinder outperformed QUAST and REAPR by 1) identified more true positive mis-assemblies with very few false positives and false negatives, and 2) distinguished the correct assemblies corresponding to structural variations from mis-assembled sequence. misFinder can be freely downloaded from https://github.com/hitbio/misFinder .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Netherlands 2 3%
Norway 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Computer Science 7 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,239,275
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,132
of 7,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,493
of 253,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.