↓ Skip to main content

Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for simple detection of Leishmania infection

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for simple detection of Leishmania infection
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1202-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaichontat Sriworarat, Atchara Phumee, Mathirut Mungthin, Saovanee Leelayoova, Padet Siriyasatien

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease that is caused by an obligate intracellular protozoan of the genus Leishmania. Recently, an increasing number of autochthonous leishmaniasis cases caused by L. martiniquensis and the novel species L. siamensis have been described in Thailand, rendering an accurate diagnosis of this disease critical. However, only a few laboratories are capable of diagnosing leishmaniasis in Thailand. To expand leishmaniasis diagnostic capabilities, we developed a simple colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique for the direct detection of Leishmania DNA. LAMP was performed for 75 min using four primers targeting the conserved region of the18S ribosomal RNA gene, and the DNA indicator used was malachite green (MG). To simulate crude samples, cultured promastigotes of L. siamensis were mixed with blood or saliva. Also, clinical samples (blood, saliva, and tissue biopsies) were obtained from patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). All samples were boiled for 10 min and introduced directly into the LAMP reaction mixture without DNA purification. The use of MG resulted in an unambiguous differentiation of positive and negative controls. For L. siamensis, the detection limit was 10(3) parasites/mL or 2.5 parasites/tube. Saliva, tissue biopsies, and whole blood were indicative of active Leishmania infection, and their direct usages did not adversely affect the detection limit. In addition, this LAMP assay could detect DNA from multiple Leishmania species other than L. siamensis and L. martiniquensis, including L. aethiopica, L. braziliensis, L. donovani and L. tropica. The simplicity and sensitivity of LAMP in detecting active Leishmania infection could enable the rapid diagnosis of leishmaniasis, thereby facilitating the survey and control of leishmaniasis in Thailand. However, our limited number of samples warranted a further validation with a larger cohort of patients before this assay could be deployed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,205,673
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,239
of 5,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,369
of 288,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#21
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.