You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-015-0048-1 |
| Authors |
Dilys Roe, Francesca Booker, Mike Day, Wen Zhou, Sophie Allebone-Webb, Nicholas A. O. Hill, Noelle Kumpel, Gillian Petrokofsky, Kent Redford, Diane Russell, Gill Shepherd, Juliet Wright, Terry C. H. Sunderland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 19% |
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 81 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#807,013
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#21
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,213
of 395,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them